by Jennifer Kalika
Jennifer Kalika has been a string instrument teacher for over 20 years. She has taught all ages, but her love lies in teaching primary school students. She currently teaches at an independent PreK-12 school in the Twin Cities. Jennifer participated in a study tour at the Loris Malaguzzi Center in Reggio Emilia, Italy and holds a graduate certificate in Early Childhood Education Pedagogy from CU Denver. An avid performing musician as well, Jennifer plays both modern and baroque viola and is a member of the Lyra Baroque Orchestra in St. Paul, Minnesota.
At first glance, particularly from a beginner’s perspective, the Reggio Emilia approach seems wholly disconnected from traditional, skills-based teaching and learning. My practice, as a string instrument teacher (violin, viola, cello), was very teacher-led, highly structured and prioritized mastering specific skills delivered within a 30-minute, once-a week lesson schedule. This approach to teaching focuses on repetition and incorporates strong adult influence, be it from the teacher or the parent. The idea of an emergent curriculum can feel intimidating for those used to structured instruction. These teaching techniques place little emphasis on student exploration or interest.
I’ve been part of the arts faculty in a PreK-12 independent school for 13 years. Over the last few years, the Lower School underwent physical and organizational changes to broaden and deepen its attention to Reggio Emilia philosophy with a new Early Learning Center (ELC) for PreK-1st grade.
I discovered a connection between the Reggio Emilia approach and general music teaching for young students. I was already familiar with the Orff-Schulwerk Approach to music education and identified correlations with its child-led vocal and instrumental exploration and creation through improvisation and composition. There are many articles that describe clear connections between Reggio-inspired pedagogy and the Orff-Schulwerk approach. However, I struggled to find much written about string teaching with a Reggio mindset. As I pursued information about this philosophy, I actively explored how I might incorporate the Reggio Emilia principles into my context. What could make learning a string instrument interesting to a PreK student so they feel choice, inspiration and interest? What if the teacher took the time – perhaps a whole year – to explore aspects of string instruments that 4 and 5-year-olds find interesting?
As changes began at my school, I was determined to learn more about the Reggio approach. I started with the PreK teachers at my school who had created Reggio Emilia-inspired environments in their classrooms. They directed me to Reggio Children, the website for the Loris Malaguzzi International Center in Reggio Emilia, Italy where I participated in a summer online workshop.
The founders of the Reggio Emilia approach were inspired by great educational thinkers like Piaget and Dewey whose philosophy of education for young children places the child at the center of their learning process. They emphasized the history of the educational system in Italy prior to World War II and how it impacted the education system, especially for preschool children. The unique cultural and political nature of this region continues to influence the development of this educational approach.
I also looked within the United States for further educational opportunities in the Reggio Emilia approach and discovered the Boulder Journey School, an established preschool in Boulder, CO, which incorporates the Reggio Emilia approach and has an excellent teacher education and professional development program in collaboration with the University of Colorado, Denver.
I enrolled in the teacher training at Boulder Journey School and practiced documenting student activity using note-taking and photos and videos for that entire semester. In addition to my coursework, I began to document in my classroom.
Still, I struggled to find a connection between my string teaching context and the Reggio Emilia approach. What I needed was to connect my experiences teaching young string students with the child-centered emergent curriculum that is at the core of the Reggio Emilia approach. I shared ideas and had multiple conversations with various colleagues about how we could incorporate the Reggio Emilia thinking into our teaching.
-
How can I incorporate the Reggio Emilia philosophy into string teaching at the early learning level for students in PreK, Kindergarten and 1st grade?
-
How can I structure string teaching so that children’s learning is visible and they feel empowered as creators of their own knowledge?
-
How can I connect children with community in a way that is meaningful to them?
-
How can I devise a way for learning string instruments to be more equitable and accessible to all ELC students?
I considered the children. They pursue knowledge, and my role is to support their curiosity and trust in their abilities as collaborators. I needed to be more comfortable with 4 and 5 year-olds handling string instruments and other materials. This was a challenging prospect considering my school had just purchased twelve small string instruments that were my responsibility! I also needed to relax my pacing to provide students with ample time to explore and create. My focus switched from providing students with information to asking questions, to find out what they already know and what they want to know.
Drawing on the children’s interests and thinking about my questions and conversations with colleagues, I outlined a curriculum as a “string journey.”
PreK: Exploration – What is a string instrument?

Kindergarten: First experiences – short units on violin, viola and cello

First Grade: Introduction to formal instruction on chosen instrument – violin, viola or cello.

The curriculum itself is emergent, drawing from the children's curiosity and desire for knowledge. Now, I see the students as partners and participants in the process of the acquisition of this knowledge.
For PreK, I offer provocations to spark student interest – planting a seed or introducing a potential topic. For example, last year I provided natural materials to construct “instruments.” The children discussed their ideas and collaborated as their inventions materialized. Other avenues of interest developed and a handful of students delved into that research, while others remained with the original idea.
Many provocations I introduce take off, and the children spend ample amounts of time on their ideas, sometimes carrying over several class meetings. Knowing when to move on is an important skill for the teacher.
An important part of my role as teacher is to document the children's processes as they are occurring. I observe closely and listen carefully. Sometimes I ask questions to see what the children are thinking, such as, “how did you come up with your idea?” As the children answer, others add into the conversation and share their point of view. I sometimes pose follow up questions to help us dive a little deeper.
I use documentation in my teaching, because it allows me to look back and reveal areas of student interest that I missed or passed by too quickly. It provides me with material from which I can build upon student knowledge and avenues for fresh provocations and research.
To document, I use my phone to take candid photos and videos of the students sharing their learning. On occasion, I transcribe a video where two students are researching something together. Another type of documentation is of a creation, such as an instrument made from natural materials or a drawing of sound waves. Children’s work is visible throughout the school, making learning visible to the entire school community. This is a powerful method of sharing children’s thinking.
The process of documenting student work can be a daunting prospect if one has never explored its possibilities. Beginning with small steps is helpful. A great way to start is to choose only a couple of groups to document for a short period of time. Keep things simple with a photo here and there or a quick video of students working together. Then, set an intentional time to revisit and reflect on your documentation. Print photos, transcribe a snippet of conversation and consider what part of the learning you want to build upon.
As a provocation, I offered the children an array of loose string instrument parts. These included broken pieces of violins, like fingerboard, pegs, bridges, bows, string, etc.

I did not provide any verbal direction to the children, but rather, observed them follow their curiosity. Many attempted to put together their concept of an instrument. Others were interested in manipulating the parts to try to make a sound.
One student, while examining a bow, discovered that there were small mechanisms that manipulated the tension of the bow hair.

“Hey, there’s a screw.”
Brian discovers that there is a screw that loosens the bow hair.

“Look! It comes off!”
Brian discovers that the frog is removable and the bow hair is loose.
I invited the owner and head luthier from a local violin shop to come visit the PreK classes and demonstrate a bow being re-haired. The students were enthralled. He started by having one of the students cut the bow hair of the bow that he was going to work with, which is a big no-no in the string world! We used a camera to document so the children could see what he was doing close-up. They were fascinated by the new horse hair that he brought for rehairing the bow, and the luthier passed a lock of horse hair around for the students to hold and feel. Following the event, I expanded upon the students’ excitement and interest in horse hair with a provocation about the bow and what it is made of, specifically, horse hair. This tied the whole experience together and expanded the children’s interest in the process of rehairing.
. 
An emergent curriculum still maintains a level of classroom structure and planning and this can take time to balance and incorporate. For my purposes, I am able to utilize a more authentic Reggio Emilia approach with my youngest students and allow skills to become a part of the learning exploration. I discovered that the Reggio Emilia approach is, in fact, organically aligned to string instrument education–or any education for that matter. I find it to be a perfect fit for me personally and professionally. It allows me time and flexibility in my teaching. If a student wants to stop and try something, or ask a question about a part of the instrument, we can take the time to explore. Of course, I would like to deliver my lesson plans in a timely manner and I have goals that I would like to achieve with my students, but now I don’t feel as much haste in the process. My intention is to expose my students to string instruments in a way that brings them joy and a sense of accomplishment. The children come first. They are capable, curious, knowledge-seekers and have the right to equal access to learning a string instrument.
The ELC string program has two years under its belt. As with any new program, we’re finding large and small ways to evolve. I never imagined myself, at this point in my career, undertaking this complete shift in the philosophy, approach and delivery of my teaching. I am now teaching more authentically and with greater intention. Continued growth depends on patience, perseverance and good communication.